DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Vectra
MGMakeOpel
ZSModelVectra
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Vectra
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
19 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Vectra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Vectra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Vectra
4520 mmLength4596 mm
1700 mmWidth1798 mm
1390 mmHeight1460 mm
1125 KgWeight1395 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…