DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationNissan X-Trail
MGMakeNissan
ZSModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationNissan X-Trail
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
19 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower140 HP
160 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationNissan X-Trail
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationNissan X-Trail
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationNissan X-Trail
4520 mmLength4510 mm
1700 mmWidth1765 mm
1390 mmHeight1675 mm
1125 KgWeight1445 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…