DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeNissan
ZSModelBluebird
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
19 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
117 HPPower117 HP
160 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4495 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1465 mm
1125 KgWeight1270 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…