DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
MGMakeKia
ZSModelSportage
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
9,0 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
19 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower128 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/70R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
4520 mmLength4315 mm
1700 mmWidth1764 mm
1390 mmHeight1650 mm
1125 KgWeight1440 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…