DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Kia Sephia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sephia
MGMakeKia
ZSModelSephia
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sephia
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
19 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
117 HPPower111 HP
160 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sephia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sephia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sephia
4520 mmLength4427 mm
1700 mmWidth1711 mm
1390 mmHeight1415 mm
1125 KgWeight1115 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Kia Sephia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…