DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Citroen C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C8
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelC8
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C8
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
19 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower136 HP
160 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C8
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C8
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C8
4520 mmLength4727 mm
1700 mmWidth1854 mm
1390 mmHeight1766-1856 mm
1125 KgWeight1610 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Citroen C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…