DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZR vs 2005 Great Wall Deer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeGreat Wall
ZRModelDeer
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4870 mm
1690 mmWidth1750 mm
1400 mmHeight1800 mm
1155 KgWeight1575 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZR and 2005 Great Wall Deer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…