DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZR vs 2004 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
ZRModelScenic
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Scenic
10,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
185 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
260 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Scenic
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Scenic
4011 mmLength4259 mm
1690 mmWidth1810 mm
1400 mmHeight1620 mm
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZR and 2004 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…