DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Megane
MGMakeRenault
ZRModelMegane
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Megane
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower135 HP
260 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Megane
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Megane
4011 mmLength4209 mm
1690 mmWidth1777 mm
1400 mmHeight1458 mm
1155 KgWeight1240 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…