DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Peugeot 206 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 206
MGMakePeugeot
ZRModel206
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 206
10,0 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
185 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower135 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 206
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 206
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/55 R15V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 206
4011 mmLength3835 mm
1690 mmWidth1673 mm
1400 mmHeight1430 mm
1155 KgWeight1050 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2442 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…