DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C5
MGMakeCitroen
ZRModelC5
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C5
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
183 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
101 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C5
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C5
4011 mmLength4618 mm
1690 mmWidth1770 mm
1400 mmHeight1476 mm
1130 KgWeight1318 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…