DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 MG ZR vs 2001 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A3
MGMakeAudi
ZRModelA3
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A3
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
183 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A3
4011 mmLength4152 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1400 mmHeight1427 mm
1130 KgWeight1185 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 MG ZR and 2001 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…