DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 MG ZR vs 2001 Toyota Opa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Opa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Opa
MGMakeToyota
ZRModelOpa
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Opa
7,8 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Opa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Opa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Opa
4011 mmLength4250 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1530 mm
1090 KgWeight1210 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 MG ZR and 2001 Toyota Opa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Opa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…