DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Laguna
MGMakeRenault
ZRModelLaguna
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Laguna
9,1 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
192 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Laguna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption10 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Laguna
4011 mmLength4576 mm
1690 mmWidth1772 mm
1400 mmHeight1429 mm
1070 KgWeight1355 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…