DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationOpel Vectra
MGMakeOpel
ZRModelVectra
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationOpel Vectra
9,1 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
192 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationOpel Vectra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationOpel Vectra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationOpel Vectra
4011 mmLength4495 mm
1690 mmWidth1707 mm
1400 mmHeight1425 mm
1070 KgWeight1360 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…