DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 MG ZR vs 2001 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationFord Mondeo
MGMakeFord
ZRModelMondeo
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationFord Mondeo
9,1 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
192 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationFord Mondeo
4011 mmLength4731 mm
1690 mmWidth1812 mm
1400 mmHeight1429 mm
1070 KgWeight1373 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 MG ZR and 2001 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…