DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZR vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo V50
MGMakeVolvo
ZRModelV50
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo V50
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
103 HPPower100 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo V50
4011 mmLength4522 mm
1690 mmWidth1845 mm
1400 mmHeight1457 mm
1060 KgWeight1335 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZR and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…