DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Seat Arosa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationSeat Arosa
MGMakeSeat
ZRModelArosa
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationSeat Arosa
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
179 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
123 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationSeat Arosa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank34 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/55R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationSeat Arosa
4011 mmLength3536 mm
1690 mmWidth1639 mm
1400 mmHeight1460 mm
1060 KgWeight965 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…