DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Kangoo
MGMakeRenault
ZRModelKangoo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Kangoo
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
179 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
123 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Kangoo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Kangoo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Kangoo
4011 mmLength3995 mm
1690 mmWidth1663 mm
1400 mmHeight1827 mm
1060 KgWeight1170 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…