DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Clio
MGMakeRenault
ZRModelClio
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Clio
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
179 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
123 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationRenault Clio
4011 mmLength3773 mm
1690 mmWidth1639 mm
1400 mmHeight1417 mm
1060 KgWeight1035 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…