DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 MG ZR vs 2001 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A2
MGMakeAudi
ZRModelA2
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A2
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
179 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
123 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationAudi A2
4011 mmLength3826 mm
1690 mmWidth1673 mm
1400 mmHeight1553 mm
1060 KgWeight995 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 MG ZR and 2001 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…