DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG Xpower SV vs 2009 Ford Shelby Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG Xpower SV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeFord
Xpower SVModelShelby
2004Model year2009
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h—
254 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4600 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
320 HPPower324 HP
410 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/40 ZR18; 265/40 ZR18Tyre size235/50 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4765 mm
1900 mmWidth1877 mm
1320 mmHeight1372 mm
1540 KgWeight1525 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG Xpower SV and 2009 Ford Shelby approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG Xpower SV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…