DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG TF vs 2004 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeLand Rover
TFModelFreelander
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
205 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
136 HPPower117 HP
165 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/45 R16; 215/40 R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3943 mmLength4368 mm
1630 mmWidth1809 mm
1261 mmHeight1708 mm
1105 KgWeight1510 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG TF and 2004 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…