DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG TF vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationRenault Megane
MGMakeRenault
TFModelMegane
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

MG TFSpecificationRenault Megane
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
116 HPPower107 HP
145 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationRenault Megane
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationRenault Megane
3943 mmLength4082 mm
1630 mmWidth1698 mm
1261 mmHeight1368 mm
1095 KgWeight1125 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG TF and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…