DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 MG MGF vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MGFSpecificationMazda Capella
MGMakeMazda
MGFModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

MG MGFSpecificationMazda Capella
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MGFSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG MGFSpecificationMazda Capella
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG MGFSpecificationMazda Capella
3920 mmLength4575 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1260 mmHeight1440 mm
1060 KgWeight1210 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 MG MGF and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…