DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 MG MGF vs 1996 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeVolkswagen
MGFModelPassat
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
193 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3920 mmLength4670 mm
1630 mmWidth1740 mm
1260 mmHeight1460 mm
1060 KgWeight1308 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 MG MGF and 1996 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…