DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 MG MGF vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeAlfa Romeo
MGFModel155
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1773 cc
120 HPPower126 HP
160 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3920 mmLength4443 mm
1630 mmWidth1730 mm
1260 mmHeight1425 mm
1060 KgWeight1400 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 MG MGF and 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…