DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 MG MG6 vs 2016 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeToyota
MG6ModelHarrier
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
120 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1849 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
150 HPPower151 HP
350 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6GearsSuper CVT-i
—Tyre size225/65 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4651 mmLength4720 mm
1827 mmWidth1835 mm
1472 mmHeight1690 mm
1521 KgWeight1560-1630 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 MG MG6 and 2016 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…