DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 MG MG6 vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MG6SpecificationFord Kuga
MGMakeFord
MG6ModelKuga
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG MG6SpecificationFord Kuga
8,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
120 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1849 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MG6SpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG MG6SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG MG6SpecificationFord Kuga
4651 mmLength4531 mm
1827 mmWidth1838 mm
1472 mmHeight1703 mm
1521 KgWeight1614 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 MG MG6 and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…