DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Villager vs 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Villager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeJeep
VillagerModelGrand Cherokee
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
176 km/hTop speed173 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement3125 cc
173 HPPower140 HP
271 NmTorque384 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank78 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4610 mm
1900 mmWidth1839 mm
1780 mmHeight1762 mm
1815 KgWeight1856 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2691 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Villager and 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Villager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…