DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Villager vs 1996 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Villager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeGAZ
VillagerModel31
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
176 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement3400 cc
173 HPPower170 HP
271 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank78 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength5050 mm
1900 mmWidth1800 mm
1780 mmHeight1430 mm
1815 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Villager and 1996 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Villager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…