DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Villager vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Villager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeCitroen
VillagerModelXM
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
160 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
151 HPPower200 HP
235 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,2 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4708 mm
1872 mmWidth1794 mm
1717 mmHeight1389 mm
1800 KgWeight1500 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Villager and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Villager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…