DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mercury Tracer vs 1997 Tata Sumo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeTata
TracerModelSumo
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed118 km/h
1859 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
146 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank65 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4341 mmLength4450 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1338 mmHeight1975 mm
1030 KgWeight1720 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mercury Tracer and 1997 Tata Sumo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…