1995 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1995Overall Score55.25/100
1995 Mercury Tracer vs 1995 Suzuki Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 2.0 TDI (83 Hp) 1995Overall Score54.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
MercuryMakeSuzuki
TracerModelVitara
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
170 km/hTop speed130 km/h
1859 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
88 HPPower83 HP
146 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size215/65 R16 S
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
4341 mmLength4125 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1338 mmHeight1695 mm
1030 KgWeight1405 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Mercury Tracer and 1995 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…