DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Sable vs 1995 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeVolvo
SableModel960
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
157 HPPower204 HP
251 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,5 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4871 mm
1850 mmWidth1750 mm
1410 mmHeight1411 mm
1515 KgWeight1600 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Sable and 1995 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…