DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mercury Sable vs 2001 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeNissan
SableModelFrontier
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement3275 cc
147 HPPower170 HP
230 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank73 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/55 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4999 mm
1850 mmWidth1664-1808 mm
1410 mmHeight1694 mm
1535 KgWeight—
2760 mmWheelbase2950 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mercury Sable and 2001 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…