DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercury Sable vs 1996 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeVolkswagen
SableModelGolf
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
190 km/hTop speed224 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
147 HPPower174 HP
230 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4020 mm
1850 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1405 mm
1535 KgWeight1285 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercury Sable and 1996 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…