DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Sable vs 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMercedes-Benz
SableModelML
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
203 HPPower218 HP
271 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4587 mm
1850 mmWidth1833 mm
1410 mmHeight1820 mm
1545 KgWeight1990 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Sable and 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…