2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 i V6 24V (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 1999 Mazda Sentia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 24V (205 Hp) 1999Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationMazda Sentia
MercuryMakeMazda
SableModelSentia
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationMazda Sentia
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
203 HPPower205 HP
271 NmTorque272 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationMazda Sentia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption18 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationMazda Sentia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationMazda Sentia
5070 mmLength4895 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1545 KgWeight1600 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 1999 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…