DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelExplorer
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
218 HPPower213 HP
391 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank83 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4530 mm
1875 mmWidth1790 mm
1830 mmHeight1800 mm
1800 KgWeight1670 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercury Mountaineer and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…