DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mercury Mountaineer vs 1998 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeAC
MountaineerModelCobra
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,2 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
218 HPPower228 HP
391 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption17 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4155 mm
1875 mmWidth1745 mm
1830 mmHeight1230 mm
1800 KgWeight1155 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mercury Mountaineer and 1998 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…