DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mercury Mountaineer vs 1997 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeHolden
MountaineerModelCommodore
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
218 HPPower248 HP
391 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4861 mm
1875 mmWidth1794 mm
1830 mmHeight1448 mm
1800 KgWeight1400 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mercury Mountaineer and 1997 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…