DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelExplorer
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
242 HPPower213 HP
379 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank83 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4790 mm
1832 mmWidth1790 mm
1821 mmHeight1800 mm
1933 KgWeight1990 Kg
2889 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mercury Mountaineer and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…