DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mercury Mariner vs 2006 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mariner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.25–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeJeep
MarinerModelCommander
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
175 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
203 HPPower218 HP
271 NmTorque510 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank78 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4427 mmLength4787 mm
1781 mmWidth1900 mm
1795 mmHeight1826 mm
1540 KgWeight2245 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mercury Mariner and 2006 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mariner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…