DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Marauder vs 1999 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Marauder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MarauderModelMustang
2002Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
340 HPPower324 HP
481 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank59 lt
20 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/50 R18; 245/55 R18Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5380 mmLength4653 mm
1980 mmWidth1857 mm
1440 mmHeight1350 mm
1850 KgWeight1615 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Marauder and 1999 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Marauder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…