DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Marauder vs 2003 Isuzu Ascender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Ascender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeIsuzu
MarauderModelAscender
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed175 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
300 HPPower279 HP
407 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank95 lt
20 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5380 mmLength5273 mm
1980 mmWidth1933 mm
1440 mmHeight1918 mm
1850 KgWeight2245 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase3277 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Marauder and 2003 Isuzu Ascender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Ascender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…