DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mercury Grand Marquis vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Grand Marquis

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeHolden
Grand MarquisModelCommodore
2001Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement5034 cc
235 HPPower224 HP
373 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5380 mmLength4861 mm
1980 mmWidth1794 mm
1440 mmHeight1448 mm
1795 KgWeight1450 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mercury Grand Marquis and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Grand Marquis leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…