DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Cougar vs 2002 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeLexus
CougarModelRX
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
199 HPPower201 HP
228 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption17,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4580 mm
1770 mmWidth1815 mm
1320 mmHeight1660 mm
1375 KgWeight1800 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Cougar and 2002 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…