2000 • Mercury
Cougar
Mercury Cougar 2.5 V6 24V (173 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Mercury Cougar vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.5 i V6 24V (177 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury CougarSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
MercuryMakeLand Rover
CougarModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Mercury CougarSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
8,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
225 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
173 HPPower177 HP
224 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury CougarSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury CougarSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury CougarSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4700 mmLength4433 mm
1770 mmWidth1809 mm
1320 mmHeight1709 mm
1375 KgWeight1550 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Cougar and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…