2000 • Mercury
Cougar
Mercury Cougar 2.0 16V (126 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Mercury Cougar vs 2000 Audi Cabriolet Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury CougarSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
MercuryMakeAudi
CougarModelCabriolet
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
Mercury CougarSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
10,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
177 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury CougarSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury CougarSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury CougarSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
4700 mmLength4366 mm
1770 mmWidth1716 mm
1320 mmHeight1379 mm
1300 KgWeight1370 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2556 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Cougar and 2000 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…